James Franklin Montgomery
C/O 100 Bridlewood Rd.
High Point North Carolina state
District Attorney
RANDY LYON
County of Wilkes
State of North Carolina
ACCEPTANCE REFUSED FOR CAUSE, WITHOUT DISHONOR
To whom it may concern,
I James Franklin Montgomery, do hereby make this ACCEPTANCE REFUSED FOR CAUSE , WITHOUT DISHONOR OF the Traffic Citation, 7587232-1.
CAUSE
1. My Declaration of separation as of January 1, 1993, (part of which is contained in the attached document) was not disputed by the UNITED STATES or any of its political subdivisions et al, when presented to them, thereby denying any STATE of the UNION to use its Mala Prohibita statutes to claim dominion over James Franklin Montgomery James Franklin Montgomery is not one in contract with the UNITED STATES or any of the STATES united in UNION carrying the misnomer of JAMES FRANKLIN MONTGOMERY, corporate fiction, which would then amount to crimes by all parties in this action of forcible trespass, extortion, peonage, involuntary servitude and other Title 18 and Title 42 crimes. Any actions of any party mentioned above or others is now considered forced peonage and involuntary servitude, which also includes forced driving license, license or registration of any kind of property that subverts a right by changing it into a privilege and charging for it, which subjects those to Title 18 U.S.C. 1581, 1584 and 42 U.S.C. 1994 and other statutes of their own making that they are bound by their oath to their constitutions.
"...What is peonage? It may be defined as a status or condition of compulsory service, based upon the indebtedness of the peon to the master. The basal fact is indebtedness....Peonage is sometimes classified as voluntary or involuntary, but this implies simply a difference in the mode of origin, but none in the character of the servitude. The one exists where the debtor voluntarily contracts to enter the service of his creditor. The other is forced upon the debtor by some provision of law." Clyatt v. United States 197 U.S. Reports @ page 215
2. The First Constitutional Assembly, 7/25/1774, stated sovereignty reverts to the individual people, also stated in the North Carolina Constitution of 1776. James Franklin Montgomery denies waiving this sovereignty as the Treaty signers had no right to sell James Franklin Montgomery into peonage making him a subject of the Crown or citizen of the united States through the 1787 Constitution/ compact/treaty.
In 1776 North Carolina state declared the inhabitants to be freeman and; 12. "That
no freeman ought to be taken, imprisoned, or disseized of his freehold, liberties, or
privileges, or outlawed or exiled, or in any manner destroyed, or deprived of his life,
liberty or property, but by the law of the land."
Declaration of Rights 1776
44. "That the declaration of rights is hereby declared to be part of the
constitution of this state, and ought never to be violated on any pretence
whatsoever."
North Carolina constitution 1776
In the following court case you will see, that in the Paris Treaty of 1783, the king did not cede to the states or the United States government Title for this land, he did grant sovereignty to the states; and left finial determination of the inhabitants up to the states. The kings Treaty of 1783 made the freeman status of the inhabitants retroactive from 1776, declared by the Declaration of Independence and the Declaration of Rights of the individual states. In 1787 the states sent representatives to the Constitutional convention to ratify the new treaty between the states, otherwise known as the Constitution of the United States. Unknown to the inhabitants of the states several things took place. The Treaty was an incorporation and created the United States government; and incorporated the states creating the State of....; the Treaty also incorporated the inhabitant. No longer were they freeman, now they became citizens of the United States. (The word of means belonging to, see Blacks Law dictionary.)
"Being dissatisfied with the measures of the British Government, they revolted
from it, assumed the government into their own hands, seized and took possession of all
the estates of the King of Great Britain and his subjects, appropriated them to their own
use, and defended their possessions against the claims of Great Britain, during a long and
bloody war, and finally obtained a relinquishment of those claims by the treaty of Paris.
But this State had no title to the territory prior to the title of the King of Great
Britain and his subjects, nor did it ever claim as lord paramount to them. This State was
not the original grantor to them, nor did they ever hold by any kind of tenure under the
State, or owe it any allegiance or other duties to which an escheat is annexed. How then
can it be said that the lands in this case naturally result back by a kind of reversion to
this State, to a source from whence it never issued, and from tenants who never held under
it?....At the time of the revolution, and before the Declaration of Independence, the
collective body of the people had neither right to nor possession of the territory of this
State; it is true some individuals had a right to, and were in possession of certain
portions of it, which they held under grants from the King of Great Britain; but they did
not hold, nor did any of his subjects hold, under the collective body of the people, who
had no power to grant any part of it. After the Declaration of Independence and the
establishment of the Constitution, the people may be said first to have taken possession
of this country, at least so much of it as was not previously appropriated to
individuals.....Therefore, whether the State took by right of conquest or escheat, all the
interest which the U. K. had previous to the Declaration of Independence still remained
with them, on every principle of law and equity, because they are purchasers for a
valuable consideration, and being in possession as cestui que trust under the statute for
transferring uses into possession; and citizens of this State, at the time of the
Declaration of Independence, and at the time of making the declaration of rights, their
interest is secured to them beyond the reach of any Act of Assembly; neither can it be
affected by any principle arising from the doctrine of escheats, supposing, what I do not
admit, that the State took by escheat."
MARSHALL v. LOVELESS, 1 N.C. 412 (1801), 2 S.A. 70
The general assembly of North Carolina had no authority or standing to change my legal status from sovereign to a corporate fiction. Americans have been defrauded into believing they are free, because they have freedom of movement within obvious legislative boundaries; while unknown to them by their in- corporation, they were again made subjects of the king. The below quotes from the 1663 Carolina Charter reveal why the court stated in Marshall v. Loveless that the corporate States and the created corporation, United States did not have Title to this land.
The king retained Title and interest through his original Charters and managed to see that his Title and Grants/Charters were preserved in the 1776 North Carolina constitution, read the following.
"And provided further, that nothing herein contained shall affect The titles or
possessions of individuals holding or claiming under The laws heretofore in force, or
grants heretofore made by the late king George II, or his predecessors, or the late lords
Proprietors, or any of them."
Section 25, Declaration of Rights 1776, North Carolina constitution
"SAVING always, the Faith, Allegiance, and Sovereign Dominion due to us, our heirs
and Successors, for the same; and Saving also, the right, title, and interest of all and
every our Subjects of the English Nation which are now Planted within the Limits bounds
aforesaid, if any be;..."
The Carolina Charter, 1663
"KNOW YE, that We, of our further grace, certain knowledge, and mere motion, HAVE
thought fit to Erect the same Tract of Ground, Country, and Island into a Province, and,
out of the fullness of our Royal power and Prerogative, WE Do, for us, our heirs and
Successors, Erect, Incorporate, and Ordain the same into a province, and do call it the
Province of CAROLINA, and so from henceforth will have it called..."
The Carolina Charter 1663
The below court cases make it clear your presence in the corporate State of....creates legal residence and obligation to the king.
"Headnote 5. Besides, the treaty of 1783 was declared by an Act of Assembly of this State passed in 1787, to be law in this State, and this State by adopting the Constitution of the United States in 1789, declared the treaty to be the supreme law of the land. The treaty now under consideration was made, on the part of the United States, by a Congress composed of deputies from each state, to whom were delegated by the articles of confederation, expressly, "the sole and exclusive right and power of entering into treaties and alliances"; and being ratified and made by them, it became a complete national act, and the act and law of every state....
"By an act of the Legislature of North Carolina, passed in April, 1777, it was,
among other things, enacted, "That all persons, being subjects of this State, and now
living therein, or who shall hereafter come to live therein, who have traded immediately
to Great Britain or Ireland, within ten years last past, in their own right, or acted as
factors, storekeepers, or agents here, or in any of the United States of America, for
merchants residing in Great Britain or Ireland, shall take an oath of abjuration and
allegiance, or depart out of the State."
Treaties are the "Law of the Land" HAMILTON v. EATEN, 1 N.C. 641 (1796),
HAMILTON v. EATEN. =C4 2 Mart., 1. U.S. Circuit Court. (June Term, 1796.)
"Our Legislature may define and punish crimes committed within the State, whether
by citizen or strangers; because the former are supposed to have consented to all laws
made by the Legislature, and the latter, whether their residence be temporary or
permanent, do impliedly agree to yield obedience to all such laws as long as they remain
in the State;"
STATE v. KNIGHT, 1 N.C. 143 (1799), 2 S.A. 70
My January 1, 1993 declaration which noticed all relevant parties, including the State of North Carolina, has stood unchallenged from that time, I chose to depart from the corporate State, thereby un-incorporating myself, rather than be apart of a fraudulent system bent on self-destruction, and a system which enslaves the inhabitants by peonage, using the tools of debt, taxation and contract.. James Franklin Montgomery has never intentionally, knowingly or voluntarily, contracted to create a legal resident/fiction. Blackstone made it perfectly clear in his commentaries how this court procedure takes place under such conditions. This is why the first thing that is done in court is the naming of the person/corporation, read the following.
"A suit by or against a corporation in its corporate name may be presumed to be a
suit by or against citizens of the state which created the corporate body, and no averment
or denial to the contrary is admissible for the purpose of withdrawing the suit from the
jurisdiction of a court of the United States. There is the Roman fiction: The court first
decides the law, presumes all The members are citizens of the state which created the
Corporation, and then says, `you shall not traverse that Presumption'; and that is the law
now.....So that when a suit is to be brought in a court of the United States by or against
a corporation, by reason of the character of the parties, you have only to say that this
corporation after naming it correctly was created by a law of the state; and that is
exactly the same in its consequences as if you could allege, and did allege, that the
corporation was a citizen of that state.
Blackstone Commentaries Book III, pg 1553
PEONAGE BY FINANCIAL SERVITUDE
BANKRUPTCY
Congressman Lemke: "....This nation is bankrupt; every State in this Union is bankrupt; the people of the United States, as a whole, are bankrupt. The public and private debts of this Nation, which are evidenced by bonds, mortgages, notes, or other written instruments about to about $250,000,000,000, and it is estimated that there is about $50,000,000,000 of which there is no record, making in all about $300,000,000,000 of public and private debts. The total physical cash value of all the property in the United States is now estimated at about $70,000,000,000. That is more than it would bring if sold at public auction. In this we do not include debts or the evidence of debts, such as bonds, mortgages, and so fourth. These are not physical property. They will have to be paid out of the physical property. How are we going to pay $300,000,000,000 with only $70,000,000,000?" Congressional Record, March 3, 1934
Congressman Traficant said on the House floor, March 17, 1993 that:
"Mr. Speaker, we are here now in chapter 11. Members of Congress are official trustees presiding over the greatest reorganization of any bankrupt entity in world history, the U.S. government."
On March 10, 1933 President Roosevelt ordered that all Americans had to turn in their Gold, which moved our gold assets to the Bank of England, as part of the bankruptcy and new extension of this Nations credit, through Federal Reserve notes based on the all property of this Nation, and labor of every American.
This was done by Presidential Executive Order, 6073 and the subsequent Executive Orders, 6102, 6111 and 6260 [these documents are still publicly attainable in any federal depository library]
"I want to show you where the people are being imposed upon by reason of the
delegation of this tremendous power. I invite your attention to the fact that section 16
of the Federal Reserve Act provides that whenever the Government of the United States
issues and delivers money, Federal Reserve notes, which are based on the credit of the
Nation--they represent a mortgage upon your home and my home, and upon all the property of
all the people of the Nation--to the Federal Reserve agent, an interest charge shall be
collected for the Government."
Congressional Record, Congressman Patman March 13, 1933
"The ultimate ownership of all property is in the state; individual so-called `ownership' is only by virtue of government, i.e., law, amounting to a mere user; and use must be in accordance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the State." Senate Document No. 43, "Contracts payable in Gold" written in 1933.
The United States government and its sub-corporations, States of.....are operating under color of law, under emergency rule, outside of the United States constitution, as stated in the following quote from the Senate. See also, Harvard Law Review, insular cases.
"Since March 9, 1933, the United States has been in a state of declared national emergency....Under the powers delegated by these statutes, the President may: seize property; organize and control the means of production; seize commodities; assign military forces abroad; institute martial law; seize and control all transportation and communication; regulate the operation of private enterprise; restrict travel; and, in a plethora of particular ways, control the lives of all American citizens."
"A majority of the people of the United States have lived all of their lives
under emergency rule. For 40 years, freedoms and governmental procedures guaranteed by the
Constitution have, in varying degrees, been abridged by laws brought into force by states
of national emergency....from, at least, the Civil War in important ways shaped the
present phenomenon of a permanent state of national emergency."
Senate Report, 93rd Congress, November 19, 1973=20
The Bankruptcy of 1933 and the taxation which created social obligation for every American is financial servitude, which is in violation of United States law Title 18 U.S.C. 1581, 1584 and 42 U.S.C. 1994. The king has been using the American courts to recover his loses. When in the district courts (admiralty courts) the king is plaintiff, he comes against you in the body of his corporations, State or federal. The money demanded from his incorporated persons/corporations after they are correctly named, is taxation without representation, a collection of the kings debt. Therefore, all parties are not before the court which denies procedural due process and notification of who the true plaintiff is. The Officer is not the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff has not made an affidavit of truth that James Franklin, Montgomery has committed a crime or civil cause for the court to gain jurisdiction. Our courts are based on the English courts with few exceptions, the district and tax courts were called courts of Exchequer.
Exchequer: "In English Law. A department of the government which has the
management of the collection of the king's revenue."
Bouvier's Law Dictionary 1914 ed.
The equity court of the exchequer: "57. The court of equity is held in the exchequer chamber before the lord treasurer, the chancellor of the exchequer, the chief baron, and three puisne' ones. These Mr. Selden conjectures to have been anciently made out of such as were barons of the kingdom, or parliamentary barons; and thence to have derived their name: which conjecture receives great strength form Bracton's explanation of magna carta, c.14, which directs that the earls and barons be amerced by their peers; that is, says he, by the barons of the exchequer.
The primary and original business of this court is to call the king's debtors to account, by bill filed by the attorney general; and to recover any lands, tenements, or hereitaments, any goods, chattels, or other profits or benefits, belonging to the crown. So that by their original constitution the jurisdiction of the courts of common pleas, king's bench, and exchequer, was entirely separate and distinct; the common pleas being intended to decide all controversies between subject and subject; the king's bench to correct all crimes and misdemeanors that amount to a breach of the peace, the king being then the plaintiff, as such offenses are in open derogation of the jura regalia (regal rights) of his crown; and the exchequer to adjust [45] and recover his revenue, wherein the king also is plaintiff, as the withholding and nonpayment thereof is an injury to his jura fiscalia (fisical rights). Black Stone Commentaries Book III, pg 1554
The Department of Motor Vehicles was put under the direction and control of the Revenue Department by the Act of 1933, chapter 214 - S.B 238, thereby the primary concern is that of being revenue collectors .
"AN ACT TO TRANSFER THE STATE HIGHWAY PATROL FROM THE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE...."
"It is not contrary to justice that . . . America should contribute towards the discharge of the public debt of Great Britain. . . . a government to which several of the colonies of America owe their present charters, and consequently their present constitution; and to which all the colonies of America owe the liberty, security, and property which they have ever since enjoyed. That public debt has been contracted in the defense, not of Great Britain alone, but of all the different provinces of the empire; the immense debt contracted in the late war in particular, and a great part of that contracted in the war before, were both properly contracted in defense of America. . .
The Wealth of Nations, by Adam Smith, 1776
Purgatory Oath
"An oath by which a person purges or clears himself from presumptions, charges or
suspicions standing against him, or from a contempt."
Blacks Law Dictionary, 4th ed.
The Acceptance Refused for Cause, Without Dishonor is to be considered my Purgatory Oath along with my previous January 1, 1993 declaration, which shows my consistent mind set and conviction.
Refusal to dispute the above or silent acquiescence within a ten day period from your receipt of this document will show a fault and the court on its own recognizance will vitiate thetraffic citation. Failure to do this will be admissions that the parties and the court is involved in forcible trespass on the Case, extortion, via Highway Robbery and forced peonage and involuntary servitude.
Mark Twain: "...To be loyal to rags, to shout for rags, to worship rags, to die
for rags--that is a loyalty of unreason; it is pure animal; it belongs to monarchy; was
invented by monarchy; let monarchy keep it. I was from Connecticut, whose constitution
declared "That all political power is inherent in the people, and all free
governments are founded on their authority and instituted for their benefit, and that they
have at all times an undeniable and indefensible right to alter their form of government
in such a manner as they think expedient." Under that gospel, the citizen who thinks
that the Commonwealth's political clothes are worn out and yet holds his peace and does
not agitate for a new suit, is disloyal; he is a traitor. That he may be the only one who
thinks he sees this decay does not excuse him; it is his duty to agitate, anyway, and it
is the duty of others to vote him down if they do not see the matter as he does."
Congressional Record, April 9, 1934
Year of Our Lord, April Twenty Fifth, Nineteen Hundred and Ninety Seven.
James Franklin Montgomery
C/O 100 Bridlewood Rd..
High Point North Carolina
President of the United States,
The Executive Branch,
Congress of the United States,
Senate of the United States
January 1, 1993
Dear Sirs,
A long chain of events in the UNGODLY (federal) United States government's policies, as evidenced by the statutory laws it passes and agreements, treaties entered into with foreign countries has prompted this letter. Evidence of the God this government is subject to is in the laws it's representatives promote and pass. The United States government no longer abides by or adheres to God's Laws.1 Thereby changing the original intent of the Fore-Fathers, which was to establish a government that would promote commerce, at the same time protect the inalienable rights of the sovereign Citizens of the several States and bind the hands of government. While restricting the powers of government with laws based on the English common law, which is based on Biblical Law. The evidence is over whelming that our Fore-Fathers intended this country's government to be based on biblical Laws.2....
....It was not the intention of the Fore-fathers to give Congress the exclusive control of the territories, without being in subjection to the Constitution. The words in the fore-mentioned document have been twisted, obscured and maligned by lawyers, judges, and the special interest of Congress where applicable to the corporation, this is a conflict of interest, which has made it possible for the abuse of power and fraud, past and present. Through undue influence and concealment you have created a title of Nobility for the bankrupt corporation and it's Citizens giving you unlimited resources to enforce this fraud, via illiterate and duped citizen subjects who pay for their own enslavement. As a result of your concealment of information from the American people and through your changing the meaning of the Constitution of the United States, via lawyers, Supreme Court Judges who make substantive decisions based on their special interest and a executive branch controlled by foreign agents (World Bank), you have enslaved the American people.
Citing 17 Am Jur 2d 501 on Contracts:
{151}. Fraud, misrepresentation, or imposition. In regard to contracts made by parties affecting their rights and interests. The general theory of the law is that there must be full and free consent. It is said that if consent is obtained by meditated imposition or that if consent is obtained by meditated imposition or circumvention, it is to be treated as a delusion, and not as a deliberate and free act of the mind. Although the law will not generally inquire into men's acts and contracts to determine whether they are wise and prudent, yet it will not suffer them to be entrapped by the fraudulent contrivances or cunning or deceitful management of those who purposely mislead them. Fraud is material to a contract where the contract would not have been made if the fraud had not been perpetrated...
{152}. Inducing execution of contract by one not knowing its contents. According to the prevailing view, the general rule that failure to read or have a contract read to a party thereto before signing it precludes him from complaining about its contents does not apply in the case of fraud or misrepresentation, as where he is prevented from reading it or having it read to him by some fraud, trick, artifice, or device by the other party. If a person is ignorant of the contents of a written contract and signs it under a mistaken belief, induced by misrepresentation, that it is an instrument of a different character, without negligence on his part, the agreement is void. This rule may be brought into play by silence, as where it amounts to a misrepresentation of what a person is asked to sign by failing to speak when there is a duty to explain the contents of the instrument. However, the decisions are not entirely in accord in reference to the effect of a contract by which he has been overreached. Thus, the question whether one who signs a contract without reading it is so far concluded that he cannot set up that his signature was induced by a fraudulent misrepresentation as to its contents has received varying answers.
{153}. Duress, coercion, intimidation, or threats. Freedom of will is essential to the validity of an agreement. Where duress is exerted on one of the parties of such a kind as to overcome his will and compel a formal assent to anundertaking when he does not really agree to it, and so as to make that appear to be his act which is not his, but another's imposed on him through fear which deprives him of self-control, the agreement is not binding unless the other deals with him in good faith, in ignorance of the improper influence and in the belief that the party coerced is not exercising his free will, and the test is not so much the means by which the party is compelled to execute the agreement as the state of mind induced.. Compulsion produced by threats may be sufficient to destroy free agency and prevent the formation of a binding contract. To invalidate an agreement, however, as a general rule a threat must be of such a nature and made under such circumstances as to constitute a reasonable and adequate cause to control the will...
{155}. Generally ...At no time in the history of the common law have agreements in violation of law been allowed to stipulate for iniquity. The law which prohibits the end will not lend its aid in promoting the means designed to carry it into effect. It will not promote in one form that which it declares wrong in another, and hence contracts which bring about results which the law seeks to prevent are unenforceable... It may therefore be said to be a fundamental principle of the law of contracts that a contract must have a lawful purpose or object, and that transactions inviolation of law cannot be made the foundation of a valid contract.
The government by becoming a corporator, (See: 22 U.S.C.A. 286e) lays down its sovereignty and takes on that of a private citizen. It can exercise no power which is not derived from the corporate charter. (See: The Bank of the United States vs. Planters Bank of Georgia, 6 L. Ed. (9 Wheat) 244, U.S. vs. Burr, 309 U.S. 242).
Such principles as "Fraud and Justice never dwell together" Wingate's Maxims 680, and "A right of action cannot arise out of fraud." Broom's Maxims 297, 729; 38 Fed. 800. The present operation of the "de facto" government is under Foreign and Alien Constitutions, Laws, Rules and Regulations.=20 Through treaties and agreements (The U.N. Charter and G.A.T.T. and others) the United States has forfeited its Sovereignty and the Sovereignty of the States, making the United States citizen subject to a foreign Power. Since the implementation of these treaties and agreements, entered into as a result of the privilege of borrowing money from the World Bank, to continue the operation of the bankrupt United States government, the United States has been enlisted in collecting the debt for the World Bank. This debt has been drastically increased by the use of fiat money which has no substance, because there is no gold or silver to back the Federal Reserve Notes. This unlawful money has caused thousands of bankruptcies and repossessions, fraudulently perpetrated by the government of the United States and the World Bank. Since 1933 congress and the other representatives have committed high treason against the people they are sworn to protect. Congress and the Executive branch have sold out the American people for (thirty pieces of silver) the furtherance of the corporation. Congress and the executive branch have willfully and purposely auctioned off the assets of the American people. The selling off of America's assets was made possible by the President, in Executive Order 12803 of April 30, 1992, entitled Infrastructure Privatization. In the Executive Order you have defined the title of this treasonous act, which has been done as a result of the fraud you the government (representatives) have perpetuated. In section 1. (a) it says "Privatization" means the disposition or transfer of an infrastructure asset, such as by sale or by long-term lease, from a State or local government to a private party. In sub-paragraph (b) the Infrastructure Assets are defined. Obviously the usury the World Bank has been receiving from the American people (unconscionable citizen subjects) is not enough, now the World Bank is foreclosing on the United States and wants the land and the assets to pay the national debt.
Here is the definition of sub-paragraph (b)
"Infrastructure asset" means any asset financed in whole or in part by the
Federal Government and needed for the functioning of the economy. Examples of such assets
include, but are not limited to: roads, tunnels, bridges, electricity supply facilities,
mass transit, rail transportation, airports, ports, waterways, water supply facilities,
recycling and wastewater treatment facilities, solid waste disposal facilities, housing,
schools, prisons, and hospitals."
Through the ignorant volunteered compliance of the American people, as a result of the deceit and fraud of the United States government (representatives) you have enslaved the American people. The corporation created this debt through mis-management and deceit, the corporation (representatives) should be responsible for this debt and it's actions. Instead it involves the American people through deceit, trickery, duress, withheld information and coercion so the corporation (United States) can continue it's operation which, defrauds the American people in the most treasonous and treacherous way ever recorded in history. The Treasury Delegation Order No. 92 states that the I.R.S. is trained under direction of the Division of "Human Resources" (U.N.) and the Commissioner (International), by the "office of personnel Management." In the 1979 Edition of 22 U.S.C.A. 287, the United Nations, at pg. 248, you will find Executive order No. 10422. The Office of personnel Management is under direction of the Secretary General of the United Nations. The I.R.S. is also a member in a one hundred fifty nation pact called the "International Criminal Police Organization", found at 22 U.S.C.A. 263a. The "Memorandum & Agreement" between the Secretary of Treasury/Corporate Governor of "The Fund" and "The Bank" and the office of the U.S. Attorney General would indicate that the Attorney General and his associates are soliciting and collecting information for Foreign Principals. The offices of Secretary of State, Secretary of Treasury and the Attorney General whereby the whole of the government has been compromised and the trust of the United States citizens violated. As Robert Bork said "we are governed not by law or elected representatives but by an unelected, unrepresentative, unaccountable committee of lawyers applying no will but their own."
Because of the bankruptcy of the United States and international contracts and or agreements interred into, the common law was replaced by the Uniform Commercial Code and or admiralty jurisdiction otherwise known as statutory jurisdiction. This treasonous act has taken place for the sake of commerce and in order to do so common law had to be rendered to no effect or at least extremely hard to obtain in Federal Court. The bankruptcy of the United States caused through compelled performance, the following case.
"There is no Federal Common Law, and Congress has no power to declare substantive rules of common law applicable in a State, whether they be local or general in their nature, be they commercial law or a part of the law or torts." (See: Erie Railroad Co. vs Tomkins, 304 U.S. 64, 82 L.Ed 1188) The fifty States are now federal states by treaties and covenants (U.N. treaty & G.A.T.T. and other agreements) making the federal states and their citizens (tort feasor's) subject to the World Bank. The people of America are being drained of their wealth via I.M.F and the I.R.S. to repay the Bank's usury. The following are excerpts from the INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS.102d Congress 2d Session, Exec. Rept. 102-23 January 30,1992
The Covenant states expressly that obligations undertaken by the Parties extend to all parts of federal states "without limitations or exceptions." (See: page six #5 obligations of Federal States I.C.C.P.R. January 30, 1992).
The Constitution of the United States no longer exists as a working document due to the bankrupt de facto corporation, and as a result of treaties and covenants made with foreign entities, as a result of accepted privileges by the United States government and the States. The fifty States are no longer Sovereign individual Jurisdictions subject to God Almighty.10 In 1934 the States became sureties for the bankrupt United States. After the United States joined the United Nations in 1945 the fifty States became federal states belonging to the one world government, it's citizens are slaves and valuable only as long as they can produce labor and products for sale on the world market. During the negotiation of the Covenant, the "federal state" issue assumed some importance because there were legally justified practices, at the State and local level, which were both manifestly inconsistent with the Covenant and beyond the reach of Federal authority under the law in force at that time; that is no longer the case. (See: page 18 I.C.C.P.R.)
The proposed understanding is similarly intended to signal to our treaty partners that the U.S. will implement its obligations under the Covenant by appropriate legislative, executive and judicial means, federal or state as appropriate, and that the Federal Government will remove any federal inhibition to the States' abilities to meet their obligations. (See: page 18 I.C.C.P.R.)
Nothing in this Covenant requires or authorizes legislation, or other action, by the United States of America prohibited by the Constitution of the United States as interpreted by the United States. (See: page 24 I.C.C.P.R.)
You have committed high treason against America's people and thought to elevate yourselves above God Almighty. Through lies and false information, coercion and duress you have enslaved a free people, through despotism and for the love of money you have changed the laws to support your usury and corruption. You have broken the covenant entered into with the American people. You have entered into covenants with foreign agents and governments making you unable through these compromising covenants to protect the American Citizens freedom and property.
I do not wish to be a party to the fraud perpetrated by the United States, so I hereby give notice with accompanying affidavit of the removal of all unqualified signatures and power of attorney. Thereby removing my signature from all papers, instruments and chattels implying oblation to the nations debt created by the fraud of the United States corporation. The violation of God's Laws and the elimination of the common law, adhered to and established as the law of the land by the Fore-Fathers leaves no right or recourse in the federal courts and or federal state courts. Thereby freeing this informed citizen of the Kingdom of Heaven of any obligation and or torts as a result of tacit admissions implying obligation or responsibility, voluntary or involuntary contracts made with the defunct government of the United States, thereby relieving me from any obligation from said government.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[10] Luke 4:8
And Jesus answered and said to him, "Get behind Me, Satan!
For it is written, 'You shall worship the LORD your God, and Him
only you shall serve.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
As practiced by the Senate and Congress of the United States, I James Franklin Montgomery reserve the right to revise and extend any and all remarks made in this document of declaration.
I James Franklin Montgomery declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing declaration of status is true and correct.
James Franklin Montgomery Date
Sui Juris, Jure Divino, Jura Sanguinis
Ambassador of the Kingdom of Heaven
CC: Secretary of State
Chief Justice of the Supreme Court
Attorney General
Members of the House
Members of the Senate
Secretary of Treasury
Chairman of Banking Committee
Secretary of Commerce
REMOVAL OF UNQUALIFIED SIGNATURES AND POWER OF ATTORNEY
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
I, James Franklin Montgomery, with my presence being in Guilford County, North Carolina state, but not of the corporate body politic of either, and being born into the American Republic and not in the District of Columbia or any of its territories. I, hereby remove any unqualified signature and power of attorney on the following documents, but not limited to my birth certificate and my application for a social security number for the following reasons listed below, and any and all documents of incorporation implying 14th Amendment citizenship.
1. Having been made a ward of the State and federal government without my permission, because of my parents being mislead into obtaining a birth certificate for there son.
2. Having been mislead as a teenager by persons of authority, government agencies, public school teachers, government sponsored adds and IRS instructed tax paying businesses, who said adamantly that I had to have a social security number to work. I then obtained a social security number so I could work, with out any knowledge of the fact that this made me a contributor of the national debt and equally responsible for its repayment.
Now of my own right and not under any legal disability, or the power of another, or guardianship, I do hereby remove, all unqualified signatures on any instruments and any express or implied power of attorney therewith. In fact or assumption, signed either by me or anyone acting as my agent, or legal guardian, or unsigned, as it pertains to documents implying 14th Amendment citizenship, which were created by the United States government acting in its questionable insular capacity. Due to the use of various elements of fraud and misrepresentation, duress, coercion, mistake, bankruptcy, by said agencies/entities, I hereby cancel, repudiate and refuse to accept any benefit, franchises and or privileges attached to the above mentioned socialist agreements, but not limited to the birth certificate and social security number.
I make void for lack of good faith and notice on the part of the United States government, any and all unqualified signatures implying 14th Amendment citizenship.
I, James Franklin Montgomery, do hereby remove, annul, withdraw, abrogate, recant, negate, delete, nullify, expunge, cancel, repudiate, disavow, renounce, and relinquish all unqualified signatures and powers of attorney, in fact or assumption, with or without my consent and of knowledge, as it pertains to all property, real or personal, obtained in the past, present or future. I am the sole and absolute possessor/owner and possess absolute unqualified full right and allodial title to any and all such property. I have no effectively connected business within the United States government, nor do I practice interstate commerce between the United States government and any federal state including the State of North Carolina "Body Politic" corporation.
This instrument replaces, cancels, repudiates the prior instruments that are filed with the United States Government and any and all other governmental entities anywhere which may execute on said prior instrument(s), and this document shall become a permanent part of the records of the United States government and the State of North Carolina principles.
As practiced by the Senate and Congress of the United States, I James Franklin Montgomery reserve the right to revise and extend any and all remarks made in this document of Removal of unqualified signatures and power of attorney.
I, James Franklin Montgomery declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing document is true and correct.
James Franklin Montgomery
Jure Divino, Jura Sanguinis,
Sui Juris
The parties below are noticed by Carbon Copy, notice to the agent is notice to the principle:
CC: Nicholas Lyell, Atty. Gen, Great Britain
Governor/Council of State, Jim Hunt
State Patrol/Revenue, Officer Speas
Clerk of Court, County of Wilkes
The United States is still a British Colony; Part 1
The United States is still a British Colony; Part 2